Do planners feel a sense of ownership over the neighborhoods they work in?
Conclusion
“While a few planners would identify their relationship with the community they work in as one of ownership, most reject the term “ownership” to describe what they deem to be their role as a key decision maker or facilitator of change. They distinguish ownership and what they have with words that they feel more appropriately encompass their relationship, primarily investment, but also responsibility, accountability, and participation. Even among planners who do accept “ownership” as a term appropriate for their profession, these concepts also dominate their descriptions of what that means in a planning context.
These insights reflect that, while change making abilities are significant to the formation of a sense of ownership among residents, they are not the only things that contribute to our understanding of and embodiment of this term. Planners view their investment as a way of contributing to a community that they are not a part of, and thus do not own despite the time and resources they dedicate to the area. This reinforces the notion that belonging to an area, which is tied heavily to temporal investment, is also crucial in cultivating the sense of ownership residents feel.”