What does it mean to you to have a sense of ownership over your neighborhood?
Quantitative Considerations
“According to the 2023 State of Rental Housing in the city of Chicago produced by the Institute for Housing Studies at DuPaul University, about “54.2 percent of Chicago households rented in 2021,” a figure in line with the fairly consistent rental rates between 54-58 percent that have persisted since 2012 (DuPaul 2023). Examining the 2020 data from the American Community Survey (ACS) on the percentage of owner-occupied housing units in Figure 12 reveals that the concentration of this phenomenon doesn’t follow any distinct clustering in the North, West, or South; it is something characteristic across the city[1]. It is likely why even the residents who mentioned ownership over their home as a factor in their sense of ownership over the city qualified it with at least one other reason that also contributed to this sense.”
[1] There is a radial pattern that exists, but this doesn’t align with the patterns related to hardship or racial segregation noted in the previous chapter on demographic considerations.
Conclusion
“In conclusion, residents think about their sense of ownership in two intertwined ways: investment and change making abilities. Financial investment is defined by the amount of money one has committed to a property (such as buying it), while temporal investment relates to social cohesion and residents’ ability to enact change. It should be clarified that there can be a difference between residents’ perceived abilities to make change and their actual power to do so.
They are related in that perceived ability stems from witnessing the fruits of advocacy and engagement. While this perceived ability to make changes, directly or indirectly, seems to have a large part in influencing what people would call “ownership” over their neighborhood, it does not alone define ownership. This becomes more apparent when asking residents who work as planners whether they feel a sense of ownership over the communities they work in—communities where they have a large degree of influence in what happens but do not live.”